Proline Juniper Networks SRX-SFP-10GE-SR Compatible TAA 10GBase-SR SFP+ Transceiver (MMF, 850nm, 300m, LC, DOM)
$600.00
$195.99
Mfg # SRX-SFP-10GE-SR-PRO
CDW # 3197989
| UNSPSC 43201404
Quick tech specs
- SFF-8432 and SFF-8472 Compliance
- Duplex LC Connector
- Multi-mode Fiber
- Excellent ESD Protection
- RoHS Compliant and Lead Free
- VCSEL transmitter and PIN receiver
- Commercial Temperature 0 to 70 Celsius
- Hot Pluggable
- Metal with Lower EMI
Know your gear
This Juniper Networks® SRX-SFP-10GE-SR compatible SFP+ transceiver provides 10GBase-SR throughput up to 300m over multi-mode fiber (MMF) using a wavelength of 850nm via an LC connector. Our transceiver is built to meet or exceed OEM specifications and is guaranteed to be 100% compatible with Juniper Networks®. It has been programmed, uniquely serialized, and tested for data-traffic and application to ensure that it will initialize and perform identically. All of our transceivers comply with Multi-Source Agreement (MSA) standards to provide seamless network integration. Additional product features include Digital Optical Monitoring (DOM) support which allows access to real-time operating parameters. This transceiver is Trade Agreements Act (TAA) compliant. We stand behind the quality of our products and proudly offer a limited lifetime warranty.
Add to Compare
Enhance your purchase
Proline Juniper Networks SRX-SFP-10GE-SR Compatible TAA 10GBase-SR SFP+ Tra is rated
4.00 out of
5 by
9.
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Girdhar Mishra from
Offers threat intelligence capabilities, packet sniffing and malware protection
What is our primary use case?
We help the customers. In some cases, we recommend it. Based on the customer demand, if a customer feels that they have to go with Juniper Firewall because they have experience with that product, then we go with it. Otherwise, we generally recommend Meraki devices.
How has it helped my organization?
The threat intelligence capability in SRX is there. But for all of those things, we need to go for the configurations.
What is most valuable?
It is a good product. There are a lot of security features, like packet sniffing and malware protection. All of those features are available. For that, we need to take separate licenses.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in customer service and support. The customer interaction is not up to par.
It is also very delayed.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have experience with this product.
How are customer service and support?
Juniper customer support, from the feedback side, is not as per my expectation level.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Compared to Meraki, Meraki is very easy to handle. Even the L1 and L2 people can handle it very easily. We do not need so much expertise to use Meraki.
Compared to Meraki, Juniper SRX firewall is complex. Configuration as well as managing the devices is complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Compared to Meraki, it’s expensive. Juniper products are more expensive.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten because of the complexity of configurations and the maintenance.
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2024-09-05T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Dmitry Spomza from
Has a very usable interface CLI, support and stability
How has it helped my organization?
We integrate these solutions with clusters, which are a risk to firewalls.
What is most valuable?
It has a very usable CLI.
What needs improvement?
It doesn't support SSL encryption.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Juniper SRX Series Firewall for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution. We work it with clusters to two SRX firewalls for redundancy.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is suitable for enterprise businesses.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex and takes a few days to complete.
I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Customers always want cheaper solutions. Fortinet is a cheaper solution than Juniper.
What other advice do I have?
It's difficult to implement when we have many policies and security.
I recommend the solution.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Integrator
Date published: 2024-08-27T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Lukas Harkabus from
Stable, scalable, and good firewall-level network functionality
What is our primary use case?
We have a lot of virtual access in the public or private cloud, as well as virtualization on hardware devices.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are the security cloud ACP and KPP features.
What needs improvement?
Juniper SRX Series Firewall is a primary network company, but its security portfolio is not a market leader. Their primary responsibility is the features that provide their products. Perhaps taking a leap and developing some features from scratch could be a way to improve.
The centralized management has room for improvement because it is outdated and not easy to integrate.
The technical support has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I give the stability an eight out of ten.
In my experience, Juniper SRX Series Firewall is the most stable compared to the primary Fortinet and Palo Alto that I am also used to working with.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
When deploying the cluster, we cannot create it anywhere, such as in Palo Alto or Check Point. We must scale appropriately, adding more devices with a load balancer or similar. Depending on the size of the area, it can be highly scalable.
Our customers range from small all the way up to governments.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is not as good as it used to be, but it is comparable to that of other vendors such as Cisco. We have found that when we contact support, we often end up dealing with the same technician and have to repeat the same procedures before we can be referred to a higher level of technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I also use Palo Alto and Fortinet. Juniper has better firewall-level network functionality.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is dependent on how much experience one has with the command line. If one is familiar with the command line, the initial setup is relatively simple. However, if one is used to working in a management setting, the initial setup can be more challenging.
The implementation time depends on the number of clusters required.
The first step of implementation is to unplug and upgrade the devices, followed by configuration before moving into production.
What about the implementation team?
We implement the solution for our customers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I find the price to be reasonable for an enterprise-level solution. Juniper has recently changed its licensing model. The licenses are annual.
The advanced security functions are an additional fee.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution an eight out of ten.
I suggest not relying on the management and primary CLI.
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2023-02-28T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Viswanathan Selvakumar from
A high-performing network security solution with a good customer support team
What is our primary use case?
The solution is used for security purposes.
What is most valuable?
The security features and the model collection are the most valuable.
What needs improvement?
I think improvement can be done to the security part, particularly the UDM, and the product should have a user-friendly interface similar to FortiGate.
It should have the Azure RBAC in the next release.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for more than ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is quite stable. I would give it a seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are using a hardware appliance and we have to choose a size based on our business. It is not like a software application, like in a cloud model.
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support team is good. I recommend contacting them if any support is needed.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are using Verax and also FortiGate products. We use them simultaneously.
How was the initial setup?
The installation was not very complex, it was rather easy. It took around one hour to complete the installation.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated the Cisco 1400 series.
What other advice do I have?
I would give it a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-03-06T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
GlennCamilien from
It's a flexible platform that offers better value for the cost than many competing solutions
What is most valuable?
Juniper is a highly flexible platform, and you get more bang for your buck compared to a Cisco product.
What needs improvement?
The centralized management platform could be improved.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Juniper devices are highly reliable. I haven't had to reboot some of these devices in five years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Juniper SRX firewalls are scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Compared to Cisco support, I would rate Juniper seven out of 10. It varies depending on who you get.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Juniper firewalls is straighforward if you have experience. You need some CLI experience. Configuring firewalls with a GUI is much easier than using the Juniper platform.
The deployment time depends on the size of the environment. I worked for a hospital system where we deployed a pair and used them as a firewall. It was relatively easy to deploy once we had a plan to bring the services in one by one as opposed to connecting the host of the hospital to us.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Juniper devices are more affordable than Cisco products.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Juniper SRX Series Firewalls nine out of 10. I recommend getting a centralized management solution because managing Juniper firewalls can be messy without it.
Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-03-11T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
EricLo from
Good performance with useful security capabilities and good reliability
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution as a firewall. We are using a two-tier firewall to protect the internal network.
What is most valuable?
This brand is one of the top three solutions in terms of firewall protection.
The performance has been very good overall.
We've been pleased with its overall security capabilities.
The setup is pretty straightforward.
It's stable and reliable.
The solution can scale.
What needs improvement?
We'd like to better understand the roadmap of the firewall.
The latest firewalls tend to have a short lifecycle.
We'd like to improve the stability and the kill rate.
The pricing can be a bit high.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for more than eight years. I have used the solution for quite a while so far.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is excellent. I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's very reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is pretty good. We can scale a bit. I'd rate the ability to expand seven out of ten.
We have about 2,000 users on the solution currently.
We do not plan to increase usage.
How are customer service and support?
We've used technical support very few times. They are fine. they respond. It's pretty standard.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is pretty straightforward and simple. No matter the brand, the setup, and configuration are very similar. Therefore, if you have some prior experience with firewalls, you should be fine handling the implementation.
Including the configuration process, the solution only takes an hour or two to deploy.
Normally, we do a POC before deploying the solution fully in order to test everything out.
We have around four people who can handle deployment and maintenance tasks.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the setup ourselves with the assistance of a consultant.
What was our ROI?
We have witnessed an ROI while using this product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a monthly licensing fee. Normally, it is a year subscription. The cost is a bit high.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We are constantly evaluating other options. If we find there are issues, we proceed to the next brand and consider that one.
What other advice do I have?
We are using the latest version of the product.
I'd recommend the product to others.
I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-03-10T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Ihor Shtanko from
Reliable with good firewall and VPN capabilities
What is our primary use case?
Customers use the solution in a cluster configuration to secure the network.
What is most valuable?
The VPN feature is quite useful, as well as the IPS. The firewall is very good.
If we need to define our user system from an anti-spam perspective, we can constantly update the antivirus. We need a subscription for such updates. It helps improve our security generally.
The solution can scale.
It is stable and reliable.
It is reasonably priced.
What needs improvement?
It would be ideal if the solution could use cloud services to help update signatures or threat prevention systems.
There might be limitations with the product, depending on the hardware we use. We need to ensure we choose the right hardware if we want more throughput. We'd like to have more control over certain parameters and over the hardware.
They could include some features that help prevent or fight DDoS attacks.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for more than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I'd rate the stability eight out of ten. It is stable enough.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. I'd rate the scalability seven out of ten.
It depends on how big the project is and how many branch offices there are. We might need more devices if it is bigger. We'd also need to use templates for all branches so that it is configured uniformly.
We tend to provide the solution for small and medium-sized companies. I've configured it for 30 or 40 clients.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't had any issues. I've only opened two or three tickets. It's a stable solution. I haven't used support too much. I'm able to solve issues myself mostly.
Sometimes there are delays in response or solving the issue.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. I'd rate the process eight out of ten in terms of ease of implementation.
The deployment time depends on which features we use. Configuring the solution may take two to three hours; however, if more modifications are needed by the client, it may be longer. It depends on the technical requirements of the company.
Firstly, I needed to update the operating system. I checked the recommendations and prepared some configurations.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is okay. It's moderate. I'd rate the pricing five out of ten.
I'm more of a technical person, not in sales. I do not know the exact cost of the solution. I'm not sure if there are extra costs associated with the product beyond the licensing fees.
What other advice do I have?
We're a Juniper partner.
I have used various versions of the solution, including the 300, 645, and 1500.
I'd recommend the solution to others.
I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a reliable solution. However, maybe, when we use the big box model, the pricing is reasonable.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:partner
Date published: 2023-05-05T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Hitesh Patil from
The solution has excellent customer service, but they should work on pricing
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for our transport domain's server. We handle booking and billing using the solution.
How has it helped my organization?
I got to learn CLI after purchasing the solution. It counts as a benefit for me.
What is most valuable?
The solution's valuable features are excellent customer service and stability.
What needs improvement?
They should work on the pricing. I am using VPN and need to pay for its warranty and license separately. It needs to be addressed.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the solution for three years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution. We never faced any issues there.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
If you have experience using the solution, it is scalable.
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup process was lengthy as I was new to Juniper. I had to explore and learn the steps to implement the solution. Even after that, there was no guarantee that it would work fine. So that wasn't very easy.
I suggest adding more articles or blogs regarding the deployment and configuration part.
What about the implementation team?
We had an engineer to help us deploy it, and the process lasted nearly six months.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the solution's pricing as a four.
What other advice do I have?
The solution is relatively easy and inexpensive to maintain. Also, I advise others to add chargeable features in the initial setup. If it increases the price of the device, that's fine.
I rate the solution as a seven.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-03-28T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of
5 by
Mazhar Saeed from
Good encryption algorithm that helps with efficient network traffic encryption but doesn't provide UTM solutions
What is our primary use case?
We use it for our IPsec VPN and for IT security and have enabled encryption on the network traffic. We use 128-bit encryption.
How has it helped my organization?
We have a very small branch office firewall, and enabling security features would degrade our traffic performance. That's why we only use IPsec VPN.
For example, we have not enabled threat management capabilities in Juniper.
What is most valuable?
We use Juniper firewalls just for network traffic encryption, and we think it's a good encryption algorithm. We avoid sniffing and some kinds of breaches in our network traffic. That's the only facility we are gaining from this Juniper firewall.
But when we implement the Fortinet firewall, we will definitely enable traffic inspection after decryption. We will enable traffic encryption and traffic inspection on the FortiGate firewalls.
What needs improvement?
It's a very small firewall, and Juniper doesn't provide UTM solutions. That's why we are shifting towards FortiGate firewalls.
We definitely have some kind of business functionality that is not matching with this firewall. Our research and development department works on it, and they recommended that we should replace it with a better firewall, like Fortinet or Cisco, and we found Fortinet more feasible.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been working with Juniper firewalls for approximately more than three to four years. We have worked with the SRX.
Different appliances have different versions because we have not updated them regularly. It varies from appliance to appliance because we are not convinced that we have to update all the versions and then upgrade our security infrastructure to only Juniper firewalls. So we did not focus on our versions and updates because we have strategies to implement a different firewall than Juniper.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a very stable firewall. We have no issues regarding hardware performance. It's working fine. Its maintenance cost is very low, and we haven't seen any kind of challenges in hardware functionality or even its services, like IPsec services.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have a scalability option, but we have a limited number of branch offices so far. So we are okay with it, but due to some UTM facilities in Fortinet, we are shifting towards Fortinet.
It's unexpected that market support is very limited now, and SRX firewall will become obsolete and reach end-of-life.
We have approximately, including all our branch offices, 1,500 end users.
How are customer service and support?
Regarding technical support, we don't require any because we use these devices underutilized, and it's working fine.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had a tender about three months ago, and we purchased Fortinet FortiGate firewall. We are going to implement it soon, within a month.
We have an IPsec VPN already established on a Juniper firewall, while we're using a Fortinet firewall as an aggregation firewall. We plan to replace our Juniper firewalls with FortiGate firewalls.
What about the implementation team?
We are just firewall deployment engineers. We just deployed the firewall provided by the security policies from the information security department.
All the security features come from our information security department, and they will look into it and provide us with the procedures, and we implement the procedures as given by them.
We are only configuration engineers. It is easy to maintain, there is little maintenance required.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend it to others. If their need is very limited and aligns with their business functions, we recommend using Juniper Firewall. It's very cost-effective, easily managed, and it's working smoothly. It's a good firewall.
Overall, I would rate it a six out of ten.
Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Implementer
Date published: 2024-08-12T00:00:00-04:00