Notifications
Notifications
CDW Logo

Pure Storage FlashBlade storage accessory kit

Mfg # FB-ACCESSORY-KIT CDW # 5044127

Quick tech specs

  • Storage accessory kit
View All View More

Know your gear

Request Pricing A CDW representative will email you within one business day to confirm your request.
Availability: 7-9+ Days
Add to Compare

Enhance your purchase

Better Together

Current Item
Pure Storage FlashBlade storage accessory kit

This Item: Pure Storage FlashBlade storage accessory kit

Call

Total Price:
Pure Storage FlashBlade storage accessory kit is rated 4.70 out of 5 by 7.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Enhanced data safety and security with cost-efficient storage modules What is our primary use case? We use FlashBlade, especially for file NAS systems, and it integrates with S3 Cloud. We use it for file and object storage. Additionally, e-series 200, 400, and s-series models are available, which have a good impact on storage. How has it helped my organization? The 75-terabyte DirectFlash modules use a moderate amount of power. FlashBlade helps reduce costs. FlashBlade has provided a significant impact by offering more storage with e-series and s-series models. It has also helped with storage management by allowing alternate IPs for seamless access in case of issues. Furthermore, the solution includes features like Safe Mode and data snapshots to enhance data integrity and security. It quickly mitigates legacy system issues with its multiple IP addresses, ensuring that another is available to maintain connectivity if one fails. FlashBlade ensures data security with encryption and multiple backup mechanisms. In addition to primary storage, backups are maintained on separate NAS volumes and managed by a dedicated backup team. A remote disaster recovery system guarantees data accessibility and integrity, allowing for data restoration regardless of local issues. It has saved between 20 to 30 percent of our time. What is most valuable? The most valuable feature is Safe Mode. Even when using two data snapshots, there are restrictions to ensure data safety based on business requirements. The SSDs and SaaS connectivity are also valuable, ensuring a high level of safety. Furthermore, DirectFlash modules and moderate power consumption contribute to cost efficiency and operational improvements. What needs improvement? The documentational aspect of FlashBlade needs improvement. It’s important for documentation to be comprehensive for all users working on FlashBlade. Additionally, more attention to documentation and large data processing is recommended to enhance user experience. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using FlashBlade for roughly around one and a half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? FlashBlade has proven to be a stable solution. I rate the stability eight out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? FlashBlade is highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? I am satisfied with the technical support and customer service, having successfully resolved several cases in the past. It has been good. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive How was the initial setup? The initial setup was straightforward, without much complexity. The deployment took one to two months to complete. What was our ROI? FlashBlade saves us a lot of time, approximately twenty-five to thirty percent. This time-saving contributes significantly to our return on investment. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate. FlashBlade is worth the money due to the experience and performance it delivers, including quick response times. What other advice do I have? I would rate FlashBlade nine out of ten. We have 40 to 50 users of FlashBlade in our organization. No maintenance has been required as of yet. I recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade for high-capacity requirements, suggesting specific models based on performance needs and price levels. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2024-10-13T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Achieves faster application performance and significant power savings with seamless data management What is our primary use case? We use Pure Storage FlashBlade as a unified storage solution for both file and object data. Our organization currently uses it for NAS and file storage, with plans to incorporate object storage in the near future. We chose Pure Storage FlashBlade for our data centers because it effectively handles the storage of our large datasets, including images and metadata. While other vendors offer similar capabilities, FlashBlade's features and specifications provide superior cost-effectiveness, performance, and storage capacity, ultimately meeting our specific needs. How has it helped my organization? FlashBlade helps reduce reliance on traditional, single-purpose storage solutions. Its versatility makes it a powerful storage solution for a wide range of data-intensive uses, including modern application development and AI/ML. FlashBlade provides the speed and scale necessary to handle massive databases and the complex computations involved in AI/ML, resulting in faster processing, increased accuracy, and quicker time to insights. Additionally, Pure Storage offers its cloud solution called Pure One, which provides real-time analytics for that device. The 75 TB DirectFlash modules deliver a 25 percent cost reduction compared to alternatives. These savings are achieved in administration, operations, and computing. The scalable design allows for future expansion based on project requirements. In terms of power consumption, Pure Storage FlashBlade uses 60 to 75 percent less power consumption. We have received good feedback from clients and users, noting that applications are running much faster than before. Daily reporting or data retrieval and storage have been significantly simplified. Prior to deploying Pure Storage FlashBlade in our production environment, we conducted thorough testing. Due to the inability to directly migrate data from our legacy system, we implemented a phased approach. This involved testing non-production data, followed by standard applications, and finally, critical applications. Each phase yielded optimal results, giving us the confidence to proceed with the production update and data migration. FlashBlade effectively mitigates legacy system issues such as outages and complex infrastructure management due to its dedicated support team that provides rapid response and resolution. It safeguards data with AES 256 data-at-rest encryption and simplified key management, including automatic key rotation. This ensures data and device security, meeting various compliance standards such as FIPS 142 from the US government, PCI, and GDPR, helping organizations achieve robust cybersecurity. Pure Storage FlashBlade enhances efficiency and sustainability, positively impacting our environmental footprint and transforming our approach to storage. It can be upgraded with no downtime. What is most valuable? FlashBlade offers low latency, high throughput, and seamless scalability. Its design allows scaling out by simply adding capacity or compute units via a single plate. The solution also features excellent data reduction capabilities, powerful security measures to protect against cyberattacks, and the ability to render entire storage into another site. What needs improvement? To improve FlashBlade, some analysts suggest enhancing its handling of relational database management systems and SQL queries. Additionally, strengthening hybrid cloud integration, expanding protocol support like NVMe over Fabrics, and broadening database compatibility would be beneficial. Finally, improvements in predictive analytics and AI development capabilities are desirable. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Pure Storage FlashBlade in our environment for two years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I rate the stability of FlashBlade ten out of ten. We have not had any performance issues. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? FlashBlade's scalability is excellent, allowing for seamless expansion without downtime. The solution's PowerScale architecture is commendable. I would rate the scalability nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Pure Storage support is exceptional. They provide quick responses and are very helpful, regardless of the severity of the issue. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We switched to Pure Storage FlashBlade from a previous vendor with comparable features because FlashBlade offered superior object storage, performance, and scalability without downtime. How was the initial setup? The initial deployment with our previous storage system was complex, requiring extensive inspection and high power availability. However, Pure Storage FlashBlade's efficient architecture minimized these concerns. Its design requires less power due to its focus on green energy, and the pre-deployment inspection process was streamlined. With comprehensive support from Pure Storage throughout the process, the deployment was completed in approximately three weeks. What about the implementation team? We had the support of Pure Storage's implementation engineers during the setup, ensuring a seamless process. What was our ROI? We have seen a return on investment with FlashBlade, realizing savings of 20 to 25 percent so far. This is due to reduced operational costs and the ability to consolidate storage devices. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? While Pure Storage FlashBlade comes at a premium price, its exceptional performance, simplified management, and enhanced reliability ultimately justify the investment for those prioritizing a seamless and high-performing storage solution. What other advice do I have? I would rate Pure Storage FlashBlade nine out of ten. We have deployed FlashBlade on-premises but are looking to move to the cloud. However, Pure Storage's API presents challenges for cloud migration. We need an API that enables a hybrid platform approach through Purity OS. Our data center hosts a diverse range of clients, from small-cap to large-cap companies. We have four people who work directly with the FlashBlade storage. Pure Storage FlashBlade requires no maintenance other than updates, and in our two years of use, we have experienced no hardware failures. I recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade for its performance, maintenance-free operation, scalability, automation, and strong security features. It suits organizations that can manage data migration from cloud to physical storage, but its hybrid cloud integration could be improved. I recommend Pure Storage products for all levels due to their high performance, scalability, automation features, and robust security with data encryption and compliance standards. However, while Pure Storage offers excellent systems at a low cost, I would not recommend FlashBlade for hybrid environments. Currently, FlashBlade lacks the necessary hybrid cloud integration APIs, making data migration between the cloud and physical FlashBlade difficult. If a client has data on the cloud, managing and migrating it to FlashBlade would be challenging due to this API limitation. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Provides quick and reliable data access as well as value for money What is our primary use case? In my current organization, we utilize FlashArray and FlashBlade primarily for critical data management. Our company deals with significant amounts of important data that require fast access, which is why we decided to purchase Pure FlashArray and FlashBlade. It is essential for data accessibility and ease of data access. How has it helped my organization? It is a path-breaking storage. I have previously worked with Dell EMC and HPE storage. Pure Storage FlashBlade is path-breaking and necessary to meet the current needs. It makes data access more flexible than before. It has significantly saved time for our organization, particularly regarding latency in data retrieval and storage capacity. Previously, we faced limitations with other solutions like Dell EMC and HPE, but FlashBlade allowed us to allocate larger TB amounts, which has been a big benefit. The time-saving aspect and reduced latency are the main benefits we have experienced. We were able to realize its benefits within a week. We found its speed, flexibility, and load balancing very impressive. We realized very early on that it is the best product in the market. Being an all-flash storage, there is no noise like hard drives. There is also a dedicated cache. It is very impressive. As compared to our previous storage, it is very easy to access. The GUI is also very good. Pure Storage FlashBlade helped in keeping our data encrypted and secured. What is most valuable? The most valuable features of FlashBlade include its replication capabilities, reports, and easy allocation. Everything is user-friendly. There is no complexity. Unlike previous experiences with Dell EMC, which required lengthy processes for configuring LAN masking and mapping, FlashBlade is user-friendly. Anyone with a basic knowledge of storage can easily work with it. This flexibility is very important for building new storage. Also, there is no hard drive, so there is not much noise. What needs improvement? Recently, while upgrading the version code, one of the controllers failed. Replacing the controller took between 14 to 20 days. We cannot accept that delay. They need to focus on that. Additionally, during disaster recovery exercises, we experienced issues with SRM volumes from VMware, highlighting areas needing improvement. They should test their upgrades for any issues, and there should also be more reliability when it comes to DRE practices. Apart from that, everything is good. They should provide more training videos and benefit programs for Gold partners like us. Pure Storage could offer training without any fees to enhance understanding of the latest features and technologies. That would be beneficial. They provide training for big organizations, but they do not do the same for small organizations. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using FlashBlade for three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? We have not experienced any glitches or downtime, and everything has been stable. Generally, the upgrades do not lead to any downtime. Two processors are there. In a single case, we faced an issue where one storage processor went down, and it took them a couple of days to replace that one. In my overall experience with Pure Storage, this is the longest they have taken. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? There are no issues with scalability. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability. We are using it at two different locations. We have a team of ten members off-site. On-site, three members are there. How are customer service and support? Customer service and support are excellent. I would rate them a nine out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? Previously, I worked with Dell and HPE solutions. However, Pure Storage FlashBlade has surpassed them with better speed, connectivity, and ease of use compared to Dell and HPE. How was the initial setup? We have deployed about 40 boxes on-prem in our data center. Its deployment is straightforward. There is no complexity. I am not directly involved in operations, but it took a couple of days to complete the setup and configuration after racking and stacking. What was our ROI? The solution has provided significant ROI, saving approximately 80% to 85% in time, money, and resources. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The pricing is relatively expensive due to the FlashBlade technology. However, for companies needing quick and reliable data access, the cost is justified. The investment is worthwhile for large multinational companies. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade if you need better security, better load balancing, and easy access. What other advice do I have? I would recommend this product because of its scalability, load balancing, and easily accessible GUI. Everything is simple and user-friendly. I would rate Pure Storage FlashBlade a nine out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from The ability to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit for us What is our primary use case? We use FlashBlade for a lot of cloud storage backup, specifically Veeam. We use the object lock and versioning functions a lot to secure the data and make it immutable. We sell quite a bit of our shared space out to the customer base as repositories. How has it helped my organization? FlashBlade has reduced our reliance on single-purpose traditional storage. In our scenario where we have a DR environment and where we provide disaster recovery services, being able to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit to us. With a lot of the immutable functionality that we had previously, we had to set up Linux servers backed by SAN. The process was huge, whereas now, we can easily spin out a tenant account and get a customer set up. It has reduced the time significantly in that aspect. Bucket creation is not that big of a deal. We can set up quotas and other good things. It is pretty easy compared to the previous immutable arrangement. It is working out pretty well, especially in time savings. Its benefits were visible immediately because we had a comparison on-site. Everything was on Dell ECS or Elastic Storage prior to that. Once we started migrating customers over to Pure Storage FlashBlade, the results were immediate. Earlier, some of the customers would purge something, and that garbage collection would run for days on end on some of the other devices, whereas with Pure Storage FlashBlade, that was significantly faster. It handles metadata very well. It has certainly made our environment more resilient than some of the other deployments we had. Other immutable devices were singular in nature. If the device went down, that whole infrastructure went down with it, whereas, with FlashBlade, we can mitigate that risk by adding additional blades and things like that. It is more redundant and resilient compared to previous implementations. We do object locking and versioning, and then the Veeam backups have encryption built into it for inline and at rest. All that plays very well together. The fact that it keeps our data encrypted and secured is extremely important in this day and age. In the industry itself, there has been a shift away from the idea of everybody wanting a bleeding-edge performance. More people are concerned about securing their data and ransomware. A lot of what we do is help with ransomware prevention and recovery. It is like our bread and butter, so when it comes to that piece, in a lot of the sales training data and things that we have seen, there has been a much higher focus on the security of data versus bleeding-edge speed. In a storage environment, everybody usually wants to get the fastest of whatever it is that they can afford, but there is more focus on securing that data this year. FlashBlade has definitely reduced our organization’s environmental footprint. Previously, we would end up deploying a repository that would be Linux or something like that. A lot of the time, that would be dedicated to a client, whereas now, FlashBlade backends a lot of our multi-tenant environment, so we are able to leverage FlashBlade for multiple tenants. Instead of having a repository dedicated to each client, we consolidated into FlashBlade where we are serving multiple tenants out of those blades. I have been able to decommission 20 to 25 repositories this year. What is most valuable? The performance of FlashBlade is excellent. It does not necessarily leverage the SOS API that some of the newer products leverage, but I found its speed pretty much on par and comparable. It is fast, and it does what it is supposed to do. With some of the S3s we had, there were issues with garbage collection routines or the algorithms that ran the garbage collection. If a customer's immutability period is 14 days, a block generation time frame is assigned to that, which adds another 28 days to it, so it cannot over-allocate the API calls to it and crush the box. They have that kind of period in there. What I found with FlashBlade compared to our ECS system or some of the other S3s that we have run is that it is significantly faster in the purging process and garbage collection process, which is a big deal to us. We have so many customers in there, and they are constantly removing backup chains and things like that, so there is a lot of churn that happens. FlashBlade is probably one of the best ones that we have had that manages that churn appropriately. What needs improvement? The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top. Veeam Backup specifically has started to streamline their API, and they are doing that with SOS API. They have optimized it. Any of the S3 devices out there that support this SOS API can have far more API calls at once. On our side, that translates to better restoration. With SOS API, it can leverage far more restorations at a single given time or read from the device in simple terms. That results in maximizing the output and throughput from the device itself. For how long have I used the solution? We have had FlashBlade in play for maybe 18 months. What do I think about the stability of the solution? FlashBlade has been 99.999% in terms of stability. We have had zero outages with it. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? FlashBlade scales easily. Anytime we need to expand, we simply order another blade and integrate it. How are customer service and support? Pure Storage is on the better side of technical support these days. I interface with Cisco, VMware, Veeam, Zerto, and other different companies. Out of all of them, Pure Storage support has been pretty good. They are responsive. They usually provide an educated response or answer back in a reasonable amount of time. They are always within the SLA. I do not have any complaints about support. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We used various S3 solutions. I am an ObjectFirst Ace. ObjectFirst is another company that came out in the last year or so, and they provide us with secure devices. We do have some of that. We have some Dell Elastic Storage. We have tested out various other software-defined ones, like MinIO. We had a good bit of experience in playing and testing with S3 before we went to FlashBlade, and I did a full PoC with FlashBlade before we decided to buy it. How was the initial setup? We have it on-prem. We provide external access to our clients for S3 buckets, but it is all on-prem. We do that specifically because of the type of company we are. When it comes to disaster recovery, we need to do a restoration when a customer has a declaration or something like that. It is far easier on our side for that data to be local than it being out in the cloud. The restoration is far faster being on-site, so we have all that stuff in-house. We deployed FlashBlade in a matter of days to a week, and it was serving data soon afterward. It took about 72 hours, and then we were tweaking after that just to figure out exactly how we wanted it. It was not a very difficult setup. It did not require extensive resources. In terms of maintenance, we had to do normal updates when something new came out. That ended up being a fairly simple, straightforward process. The updates were done in less than an hour. We schedule upgrades and our own downtime because they are customer-facing. We have not had any outages. Everything was completed in the time frame that we assumed it would complete. Everything was back up and functional after the update. We had no real issues with it. These non-disruptive upgrades are extremely important because we are a service provider by nature. The service that we provide is disaster recovery, so most of our customers are seeding data into us 24/7, and any degradation in that results in them missing their RTO and RPOs, which is not great for us. We miss our SLA if that happens. What about the implementation team? We managed the setup with a team of three individuals from storage capacity, cloud, and network teams. We need the network setup. The capacity person takes a look at all the backend to figure out what goes where. I do most of the other implementation pieces via the cloud team. The process did not require third-party involvement. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? It is within reason for what you get. From what we have found comparing it to other vendors, it is in the same range as others. Given the choice, we would definitely redeploy it based on the cost. In my opinion, it is worthwhile. I am very much a buy once, cry once kind of guy. I want to buy it and do it right the first time. What we have learned through experience is that Pure Storage FlashBlade sometimes can cost a little bit more, but the admin overhead related to storage goes down once we end up having these devices. We are less involved. There is less maintenance. There are fewer instances where a project is spaced and put into play, and then six or eight months later, we have to go back and upgrade heads or whatever needs to be done with that. Overall, the total cost of ownership is not necessarily the upfront price tag. You also have the cost of administration and doing business. There are all those things that lead to upgrades or bad decis... Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Effortless data storage with seamless expansion What is our primary use case? We use Pure Storage FlashBlade as our storage solution, accommodating our extensive data storage needs. We implemented Pure Storage FlashBlade to reduce costs by replacing physical hardware, enabling us to store large volumes of data and internally share folders for improved operational efficiency. How has it helped my organization? Training is required to use FlashBlade, but the user-friendly modules offer clear explanations, making it remarkably easy to explore and complete the initial setup after completion. It has improved our organization significantly. Previously, we faced difficulties with our old server, which was not reliable enough. Switching to Pure Storage FlashBlade resolved these issues. We realized the benefits within five months. Managing FlashBlade is straightforward, and any issues we cannot resolve can be escalated to Pure Storage support. Pure Storage enhances data protection with encrypted memory modules and a Trusted Platform Module, ensuring data is encrypted and secured. This is critical for our backup files, which we know are always secure. What is most valuable? Among its most appealing features are its ease of handling and minimal maintenance requirements. Storage expansion is straightforward, and hardware replacement is simple due to the ready availability of parts from the distributor. What needs improvement? We initially encountered challenges with the assembly process due to issues with the documentation required during setup, an area where Pure Storage needs improvement. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Pure Storage FlashBlade for two years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I would give Pure Storage FlashBlade ten out of ten for stability. We've experienced minimal downtime, only one or two hours. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I would rate the scalability of Pure Storage FlashBlade ten out of ten. It can be useful for both large data centers and medium-sized businesses. How are customer service and support? Customer service and support are highly responsive and available 24/7. However, response times could be improved for optimal efficiency, as they currently average 15 to 20 minutes. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? Our previous storage solution, Dell Storage, proved to be overly complex and increasingly prone to errors, ultimately prompting our transition to Pure Storage. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is straightforward. Due to the machine's large size, necessitating lifting and placement into a rack, three to four people are typically required for deployment. What about the implementation team? The deployments are conducted in-house, and we contact Pure Storage for connectivity checks and license activation. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? My knowledge of Pure Storage FlashBlade costs is limited as our finance team manages those details. However, I understand that it is competitively priced compared to other brands. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We evaluated different brands but chose Pure Storage due to its usefulness and the comprehensive training provided. What other advice do I have? I would rate Pure Storage FlashBlade ten out of ten. Each department in our organization uses its own Pure Storage FlashBlade. I recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade due to its cost-effectiveness. Pure Storage FlashBlade is deployed in a single room, and we distribute from there to other areas. After two to three years, maintenance is required to ensure the hard disk is functioning correctly. I recommend having training before proceeding. This allows for a better understanding of the procedures and functionalities of the solution. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Private Cloud If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Date published: 2024-10-31T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Helps to transfer data quickly between data centers but issues can happen during upgrade process What is most valuable? The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power outages when we need to quickly move data between different data centers. It ensures efficient replication and helps maintain our data centers' uptime. What needs improvement? Commvault has mainly driven the Analytics, providing data and reports. However, the product has room for improvement, especially regarding storage analytics. Upgrading firmware has caused issues, requiring feature disabling to revert to traditional backups. The firmware upgrades sometimes affect Commvault backups. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the product since 2022. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Pure Storage FlashBlade is fairly stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? My company has three storage engineers using the product. How was the initial setup? Pure Storage FlashBlade's deployment is straightforward. It took about six months to deploy the solution across five data centers. For deployment and maintenance, we needed three engineers from our team and two from the partner company. What other advice do I have? I rate the overall product a seven out of ten. It would be best if you are ready with the upgrade process. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2024-04-19T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte What is our primary use case? I use FlashBlade for shipping data to the cloud. What is most valuable? I like its size. It is smaller than the other competitors. We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte. What needs improvement? Its configuration should be easier. There should be easier language for the configuration. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the solution for one year. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The stability is good with only 30 minutes of downtime during upgrades. We do have a backup of the blade. In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? It is scalable. How are customer service and support? The technical support or customer support is satisfactory. They are good, but I do have some language challenges. They are a bit fast for me. I would rate them an eight out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive How was the initial setup? The initial deployment was easy and quick. It can be deployed in a minute. It requires some maintenance from our side. What about the implementation team? We take Unisys' help for deployment. They contact Pure Storage if needed. We have two to four people for deployment. What other advice do I have? I would rate Pure Storage FlashBlade a ten out of ten. If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2024-11-10T00:00:00-05:00

This page was printed on 11/21/2024 11:57:29 AM.