Notifications
Notifications
CDW Logo

TP-Link EAP110-Outdoor_V3 - Omada N300 Wireless Outdoor Access Point

Mfg # EAP110-OUTDOOR_V3 CDW # 5295473 | UNSPSC 43222631

Quick tech specs

  • Fast Speeds with 2x2 MIMO
  • Indoor/Outdoor Use
  • Integrated into Omada SDN
  • Equipped with Wireless N300 2x2 MIMO technology, the EAP110-Outdoor easily delivers Wi-Fi speeds of up to 300 Mbps.
  • The durable, weatherproof enclosure protects the access point against harsh outdoor conditions and provides stable wireless coverage up to 200m+ range at 2.4GHz. Discreet appearance can also fit with any indoor scenarios.
  • Omada Software Defined Networking platform integrates network devices including
View All View More

Know your gear

  • Built for outdoor Wi-Fi applications
  • Up to 300Mbps Wi-Fi with 2x2 MIMO technology
  • High transmission power and high gain antennas provide a long-range coverage area
  • Durable, weatherproof enclosure to withstand fair and foul weather
  • Passive PoE(Power over Ethernet) support and simple mounting design allow for flexible deployment and convenient installation
  • Free Omada Controller software enables administrators easily manage hundreds of EAPs
  • Captive portal provides a convenient method for guest authentication
  • Facebook Wi-Fi and SMS anthentication help to boost your business
  • Supports management vlan for an enhanced network management

Enjoy Wi-Fi Outside, Finally

Omada EAP110-Outdoor

Excellent Hardware Design

With special design of its antenna, appearance, power options and installation methods, EAP110-Outdoor can perfectly fit for different scenarios both indoors and outdoors.

Detachable Antennas

EAP110-Outdoor is designed with 2 Omni-directional detachable antennas, which means other antennas can also be attached for your specific demands.

Wi-Fi That Goes the Distance

With high transmission power and two high-gain omnidirectional antennas, EAP110-Outdoor provides stable wireless coverage at a range of up to 200 meters in outdoor settings.

High Transmission Power
High-Gain Antennas

Specially Designed Weatherproof Enclosure for Outdoor Environment

Rated as IP65 during Ingress Protection testing, a resilient weatherproof enclosure protects the access points against harsh outdoor condition.

Lightning Protection and ESD Protection
No Ingress of Dust
Waterproof Enclosure

Efficient Centralized Network Management

With Omada Controller software, small and medium-sized businesses can take command of hundreds of indoor and outdoor access points all from a single location. It's network management as it should be - efficient and intuitive.

This item was discontinued on October 12, 2023

Enhance your purchase

TP-Link EAP110-Outdoor_V3 - Omada N300 Wireless Outdoor Access Point is rated 4.30 out of 5 by 12.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Streamlined network management with cloud features and an easy setup What is our primary use case? I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized, like twenty to thirty users. How has it helped my organization? Omada is easy to manage with cloud management. It's also easy to set up, which helps streamline network deployment. What is most valuable? Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up. These qualities make it valuable for my needs. What needs improvement? Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances. For how long have I used the solution? I have used Omada for one year. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I rate the stability of Omada at eight on a scale of one to ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I have never received negative feedback regarding scalability from my clients, so it seems adequate for my needs. How are customer service and support? I have never requested technical support from Omada, as everything is clear and available on their website. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? Previously, I used Ubiquiti. I switched as sometimes Ubiquiti was complicated to configure, and the distance coverage was not good for me. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is not complex. It is very easy to set up Omada products. What about the implementation team? I manage the setup myself. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The access point is priced around 30,000 francs, and it is less expensive compared to other solutions. Which other solutions did I evaluate? I have considered testing Aruba, as many people use its solutions. What other advice do I have? Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Public Cloud Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2024-11-13T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Improved network control and facilitated direct access for developers to branch services What is our primary use case? We initially used Omada Access Points solely for our head office without integrating them with the Omada software. However, after incorporating the Omada VPN router, switch, and centralized management system, we've experienced a significant improvement in our daily operations. Specifically, in the IT department, we now have enhanced control and visibility over IP access and user activities within and outside the office premises. What is most valuable? The Omada Access Points, apart from being wireless, are significant due to their integration with a centralized system like Omada. This feature greatly enhances network control and efficiency. Previously, we relied on local Microsoft tools, but now with Omada's cloud management, we have centralized control over our network equipment, including distribution to branches. This has allowed us to configure server IP addresses more effectively and implement secure VPN connections between the head office and branches. The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services. This has streamlined operations within the IT department without affecting the customer experience. What needs improvement? Regarding the Omada Access Points, apart from upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7, I don't have any specific ideas for further improvement. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Omada Access Points for the past 4 months. What do I think about the stability of the solution? In terms of stability, I would rate it around a seven, as we encountered a few issues after making modifications to settings recently. Regarding technical support, although we haven't directly contacted them, based on support forums and reviews, I would estimate their support to be around an eight. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Omada Access Points at around seven. While it is scalable, there are some limitations in terms of user interface and certain functionalities like LB and security features. Approximately one hundred plus users in our organization use this solution daily. How was the initial setup? For the setup of the Omada Access Points along with the VPN router and Omada central software, I found it to be very easy. Once connected to the network, simply clicking "adopt" in the software handles all the settings for the access point automatically, making it a one-click process. I would rate the setup experience a ten out of ten. There weren't any significant challenges during the deployment as it was quite straightforward. My deployment took around five days, primarily because it was my first time handling such tasks. The implementation was done in-house by me, as the equipment was purchased from an online reseller. The deployment involved five people: two technical staff, one developer, and one management head, all working in-house. What about the implementation team? The solution is deployed using an Omada hardware controller connected to the head office network, acting as a server for configuring the entire company network. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness. Which other solutions did I evaluate? Before implementing Omada Access Points, we used a more basic networking setup without centralized management. We did evaluate other options like Fortinet, but ultimately chose Omada due to its affordability and compatibility with our existing devices. What other advice do I have? Based on my experience, I would recommend Omada Access Points, especially for small businesses. Overall, I would rate Omada Access Points at a nine for their functionality and ease of use, and the overall Omada networking system at an eight. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2024-04-08T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Simple initial setup, but lacking scalability What is our primary use case? Our goal is for the people of Dhaka to be able to have WiFi from their mobile devices, and this is why we are using TP-Link Auranet EAP. What needs improvement? TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it. For how long have I used the solution? I used TP-Link Auranet EAP within the last 12 months. What do I think about the stability of the solution? We have not been satisfied with the performance of TP-Link Auranet EAP. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The coverage of TP-Link Auranet EAP is very low, it is approximately 45 meters. We had approximately 200 people using the solution. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is not complicated. However, mounting the device is not simple. What other advice do I have? I would not recommend this solution to others. I rate TP-Link Auranet EAP a seven out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Partner
Date published: 2022-03-28T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A solution with excellent maintenance, deployment and setup What is our primary use case? We deploy this solution on-premises. What is most valuable? We have found the solution very reliable, and its performance is good. What needs improvement? An area of improvement is the solution's support team, and although the dashboard has everything we currently need, it would be nice if the dashboard was more customizable. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this solution for approximately 18 months. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. Approximately 15 people who work in different positions use it in the organization. One person can usually do maintenance for the solution. How are customer service and support? I rate customer service and support an eight out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We switched to this solution because it is easier to set up, maintain, deploy, and everything was much better than the previous solution. How was the initial setup? The initial setup was straightforward and deployment took only a couple of hours. What about the implementation team? We deployed the solution in-house. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Unfortunately, I can't tell you about the setup cost, pricing and licensing. What other advice do I have? I rate this solution a nine out of ten and recommend it to others. The solution is good, but the support team could improve, and a new feature in the next release could include making the dashboard more customizable. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2022-09-03T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Reasonably priced with an easy setup and good reliability What is our primary use case? We primarily use the solution for SMB users to cover areas for WiFi. It can be used in homes and businesses. It's not ideal for larger applications. What is most valuable? The stability is very good. It is easy to set up. The pricing is reasonable. What needs improvement? It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable. We're like to have more visibility in terms of who is connecting to the service. That would help us to monitor bandwidth more effectively. For how long have I used the solution? I've used the solution for a few years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? It is not extremely scalable. It's more suitable for smaller setups. YOu can also just have a limited number of users. The more users on it, the lower quality of the connection. We have five or six people on the product right now. How are customer service and support? We did not contact technical support in the past. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We did use a solution previously. However, that was a long time ago. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is pretty simple. It's very plug-and-play. You just set up everything and connect everything to the LAN. It took me about half an hour to deploy it. We can set up some parameters, and you are done. You don't really need anyone to handle maintenance. It's a small setup. What about the implementation team? We can handle the setup ourselves. It's pretty easy if you just follow the guidance in order to set up the solution. It helps if you have a bit of knowledge. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? It is not expensive. At this time, I don't have a license for it. I don't need to pay for licensing. What other advice do I have? I'm not sure of the exact version of the solution we're using. I'd recommend the solution to others. The solution is reasonably priced, stable, and easy to deploy. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Date published: 2023-03-01T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Performs well, capable mobile application, and straightforward deployment What is our primary use case? I am using TP-Link Auranet EAP for connecting multiple networks and devices at the same time. What is most valuable? The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance. What needs improvement? There should be more remote support for the mobile application. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using TP-Link Auranet EAP for approximately four years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? TP-Link Auranet EAP is stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is salable. However, I have only used it personally at home. There are five to six people using the solution in my home. How are customer service and support? I have not contacted the support from TP-Link Auranet EAP. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? I have used other solutions prior to using TP-Link Auranet EAP. This solution is quicker and has a capable mobile application to monitor changes and settings. How was the initial setup? The initial setup was simple and took one day to do. What about the implementation team? I did the deployment of the solution myself. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it. What other advice do I have? I rate TP-Link Auranet EAP a nine out of ten. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-02-28T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability What is our primary use case? The main purpose of Access Points is because most of the users use only mobile devices and portable devices. We use other special applications dedicated to our company through mobile devices only. We are connecting to the application. We currently use our ERP systems and other things on an on-premises server basis. But in the near future, we are moving to the cloud basis. So when we go to the cloud basis, actually, we want to connect very fast. We use Access Points for the same thing, to connect to cloud-based applications, also within our on-premises servers. Those are the main key areas why we use Access Points. What is most valuable? Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity. Nowadays, all technologies are developing for mobility and portability, but a wired connection is not good for all applications, especially mobile applications. Omada Access Points are very compatible with both wired and wireless technologies, which makes them very good for a wide range of applications. What needs improvement? The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Omada Access Points from TP-Link for more than seven years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? We have some issues with stability. That's why we are looking for the best Wi-Fi solutions. It is not so fast. That is the main problem. It is not only from the access point, so we are also looking for some firewall parts. So now we resolved it for the firewall part, but now we are looking for something like this Wi-Fi device. So that's why the thing is the Internet speed, another one is security. Security domains have unauthorized access through sharing their password and other things. That's the thing we want to minimize. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability-wise, this solution when integrated with Huawei is not a very scalable product, but all other networks, such as Aruba, have good integrations with other technologies. So, scalability-wise, those things are good. We have about 70 users in our location. How are customer service and support? Technical support: we are communicating with only one vendor. So he is good in technical support, but we are not dealing with the original technical support place or for the mobile. So we don't have that much experience from the device itself, device manufacturers itself. How was the initial setup? We just purchased it from some other vendor and installed it ourselves. Access Point installation is easy, but it's a little bit difficult when we are searching for some special features. Deployment requires some additional risk skills because when we require some new features or new products. So, it may take a little more time than the normal time. What about the implementation team? One Access Point takes me about one hour to complete everything and the features. The basic installation I can do that myself. But when it regularly requires something like Aruba and Juniper, they are coming in with some special features. Before I move to the new installation, I need some hands-on experience, and then I can move. Maintenance is actually 50% easy, 50% difficult. Some Aruba access points have a centralized maintenance system, which is very good. But if we have to maintain individual access points one by one, it's not comfortable. New technologies are more user-friendly because we can connect all access points to a centralized location and maintain them from there. So, the maintenance part is good overall. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better. The licensing cost is a one-time purchase. Which other solutions did I evaluate? Personally, we believe that Omada Access Points are not good enough for our requirements and the location. So, that's why, instead of TP-Link, we need some advanced technologies, something like Aruba or Juniper. We are currently using the very basic TP-Link ones, which don't cover our requirements. That's why we are looking for other technologies. What other advice do I have? When we select the access point, we need to search for speed and security. And if a centralized management system is available, that's the best one. So, that is the initial thing I want to advise other users. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. There are areas of improvement. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-10-13T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from The solution can be used for the network and Wi-Fi, but its performance should be improved What is most valuable? We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi. What needs improvement? The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved. The solution’s stability and performance should be improved. For how long have I used the solution? I have been working with Omada Access Points for more than one year. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I rate Omada Access Points a seven out of ten for stability. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Omada Access Points is a scalable solution. Around 20 users use Omada Access Points in our organization. We may increase the number of users if there's a possibility to deploy the solution supporting a greater number of users. How was the initial setup? The solution's initial setup is very straightforward. What about the implementation team? The solution's deployment takes 30 minutes to one hour. We follow the product manual for the solution's deployment. The deployment team has the technical knowledge to deploy routers. We can implement the solution remotely. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost. What other advice do I have? Beginners or small businesses can use Omada Access Points, but I cannot recommend it for enterprise-level businesses. Overall, I rate Omada Access Points a seven out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-10-12T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great for wireless networking in smaller and medium-sized businesses What is our primary use case? Omada Access Points is great for wireless networking in businesses, especially smaller and medium-sized ones. However, larger corporations and banks often prefer popular European brands like Cisco. What is most valuable? What I like the most about Omada Access Points is its reliability and easiness. It has the "glance technology" that makes it even more user-friendly. When I switched from my old Wi-Fi system to Omada, it was very simple. I've noticed a growing interest in Omada Access Points among others too. People want to upgrade their Wi-Fi and stay up-to-date with the latest tech, and Omada seems to be the way to go. In my experience, the solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology. What needs improvement? In terms of improvement, I would like Omada Access Points to be more versatile and adaptable across different industries. For example, it could be used in shopping malls to provide Wi-Fi and offer features like automatic notifications and shop promotions when you enter. It can help businesses by giving special deals to loyal customers, offering a modern way of shopping compared to the usual online methods. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Omada Access Points for almost ten years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Omada Access Points is generally stable, but there's room for improvement. Sometimes, clients may not fully understand all the features or may need third-party support for certain integrations that aren't available. For instance, a restaurant might want Wi-Fi zones but lack a billing application. These additional features could be helpful if they were included with the product. I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. We currently have less than five customers working with Omada Access Points. This is because the technology is relatively new, and people are gradually adopting it. It's not yet at its peak, but it's steadily gaining traction in the market. The plan is to expand into the hotel and tourism sector, as tourism is significant in the country. We believe there is a lot of potential in this plan for our future. How are customer service and support? We hardly need tech support for Omada Access Points because it is very reliable these days. Complaints are rare, and technology has improved, so problems hardly ever happen. It is a lot different now from the days when electronic components often had issues. How was the initial setup? Omada Access Points is easy to set up, and most people find it very straightforward. It takes about an hour to deploy. In the past, people were worried about using Wi-Fi access points because of security issues, but things have gotten much safer now. Omada Access Points can be set up differently depending on what people need. Some like using the cloud, especially for things like collecting health data in remote places. They use services like Azure for data. Projects funded by the World Bank often follow this approach to keep things clear and transparent when using funds and gathering data. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Omada Access Points has competitive prices, especially compared to European brands. It is a budget-friendly choice for companies. The licensing cost depends on the features you need. Licensing is expensive at the start but gets cheaper as you buy more. It might take a few years to see significant price drops. Typically, larger companies can afford licensing, while it's less affordable for smaller businesses. What other advice do I have? I recommend using Omada Access Points because it offers peace of mind. They're wireless, so you can move around freely. It is also great for open development projects, allowing you to set up Wi-Fi zones outside of traditional office settings. It opens up many possibilities, like working in a park or hosting training seminars with reliable Wi-Fi everywhere. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Integrator
Date published: 2023-09-26T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Fast, reliable, and robust wireless networking solution for various environments What is our primary use case? The main use case is for large industrial refrigerators, white spaces, industrial spaces, and homes. What is most valuable? Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features. What needs improvement? Omada Access Points currently offers relatively basic managing tools, which are suitable for beginners and provide a good user experience. There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities. These improvements should include more options for managing users, connections, and general device connections, to provide greater availability and meet the needs of a broader range of users. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using it for the last two months. What do I think about the stability of the solution? It has been very stable until now, so I rate it nine out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? It offers good scalability features. I would rate it nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? We did not have any need for technical support until now, so I cannot evaluate that. It is working smoothly without major complications. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We previously used Alcatel and we had a negative experience with its networking equipment. It is expensive, difficult to manage, and prone to frequent failures, particularly with cell phones. One trial antenna specifically caused major issues by denying the service. We had to reset the equipment entirely at one point, as it was unresponsive and reverted to default settings, erasing the previously set password and fixed IP address. How was the initial setup? The initial setup was straightforward and easy. I would rate it nine out of ten. What about the implementation team? The deployment process is still in progress, with delays caused by infrastructure issues. The maximum delay experienced was approximately ten days. The implementation is outsourced, we only manage the solution. We employed a consultant for integration purposes. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users. I would rate it one out of ten. I am not entirely sure if there is a need to purchase additional licenses for online management in the future, but currently, the available resources are sufficient for our needs. Which other solutions did I evaluate? After evaluating options such as Alcatel, Ubiquiti, and Cisco, we ultimately chose Omada due to its durability, cost-effectiveness, and robustness. What other advice do I have? It is a highly effective solution for industrial use, where static appeal is not a significant factor. It may not be suitable for office environments due to its cumbersome nature and larger size. I would recommend assessing the specific needs and requirements before opting for it. I would rate it nine out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-09-19T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Convenient cloud-based management, easy to set up, and quick to deploy What is our primary use case? We use this solution to provide wireless internet coverage within the company. It is something that we also implement for our clients. What is most valuable? The most valuable feature is the cloud-based management option. It is very convenient to manage. This product is easy to use. What needs improvement? The technical support could be improved. The GUI is quite good, although there's still room for improvement in that regard. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using TP-Link Auranet EAP for approximately four years, since 2018. What do I think about the stability of the solution? This product is quite stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability-wise, it is quite good. Our company is quite small. We have between 10 and 15 people that use it. One of our clients has a large plant, and they have several EAP access points on-premises. They have between 800 and 1,000 users. Since the access points were installed, they haven't had any issues with them. How are customer service and support? It is quite difficult to get support from TP-Link. They should provide more support to their clients. Sometimes, we just research the problem and solve the problems ourselves. I would rate the technical support a two out of five. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral How was the initial setup? The initial setup is straightforward and easy to do. We can set up a single access point in ten minutes. Depending on the person that does the implementation, it can be very fast. What about the implementation team? We do the implementation with our in-house team. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands. It is a one-time cost with no licensing fees. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We are currently researching Aruba Wireless products to compare against TP-Link. We chose TP-Link because it's very cost effective. It is cheaper than the other big brands, like Aruba or Cisco. Our clients prefer to have a cost-effective solution because some of them plan to scale, having a large quantity of access points. For example, some companies require 20 access points, but they have a limited budget. This means that we need to modify their plan or look for a solution for them that will fit their budget. What other advice do I have? In summary, this is a good product and I recommend it because it's easy to use. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2022-05-22T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Suitable for small companies and useful for network support What is our primary use case? I use the tool in my network support. What is most valuable? The solution's most valuable feature is its price. What needs improvement? Aruba has better scaling capabilities. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the product for a year. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? My company has one access point since it is small. How are customer service and support? I haven't contacted the tool's technical support yet. How was the initial setup? The tool's deployment is easier since it has a mobile application. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs. What other advice do I have? I would recommend the product due to its pricing. I rate it a five out of ten. However, I believe that Aruba is better than Omada Access Points. Aruba is also good for scaling but expensive, while Omada Access Points is better for small companies. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2024-04-12T00:00:00-04:00

This page was printed on 1/6/2025 12:14:11 PM.